What Sumerian Mathematics Advance Do We Use Daily?

The invention and use of new number systems by the Sumerians have had a profound impact on our daily lives, even extending to the way we tell time. The Sumerians introduced two important number systems - the base 12 (duodecimal) system and the base 60 (sexigesimal) system. Interestingly, these advancements in mathematics are still influencing us today, particularly when we look at a conventional clock.

Base 60 System and Telling Time

Every time we glance at our clock, we might not realize that the structure of time we use is attributed to the Sumerians. In our modern clock, an hour consists of 60 minutes, and each minute contains 60 seconds. This division of time can be directly linked back to the Sumerian base 60 numerical system.

Decimal System vs. Sumerian Systems

In contrast to the decimal system that is predominantly used today, the Sumerians had a distinct way of counting due to their base 12 and base 60 systems. The decimal system, based on 10 digits (0-9), is convenient for daily calculations, but the Sumerian systems also have their advantages and are still employed in specific fields.

The base 60 system, for instance, is visible in our time-telling, circular degrees (360 degrees in a circle), and geographical coordinates. The division of angles and coordinates into 60 parts can be traced back to the Sumerians and has remained prevalent in various disciplines.

So, every time you check the time or encounter a measurement based on units of 60, remember the ancient Sumerian mathematicians and their lasting influence on our numerical systems!

What specific aspects of our daily lives are influenced by the Sumerian base 60 system?

The Sumerian base 60 system impacts daily activities like telling time, measuring angles, and using geographical coordinates. These systems provide a unique way of counting and partitioning units, which can be observed in various aspects of modern life.

← Creative ways to make and send greetings cards online The impact of loneliness on physical frailty in older adults →