What distinguishes bacteria from archaea?

Is it true that all archaea live in extreme environments and bacteria do not?

No, the statement that all archaea live in extreme environments and bacteria do not is not accurate. While some archaea are known for thriving in extreme conditions, not all archaea exhibit extreme habitat preferences. The main difference between bacteria and archaea lies in their genetic and biochemical makeup.

Genetic Makeup

Archaea have unique genetic sequences and genetic machinery that differ from bacteria. They have distinct RNA polymerases and histones, which are similar to those found in eukaryotes, while bacteria have different versions of these proteins.

Cell Wall Composition

Bacterial cell walls are typically made of peptidoglycan, a unique molecule absent in archaea. Archaeal cell walls can contain different types of molecules, such as pseudomurein or various glycoproteins.

Plasma Membrane Structure

Archaeal plasma membranes are composed of unique lipids called isoprenoids, while bacterial plasma membranes contain different types of lipids.

Metabolic Pathways

Archaea exhibit diverse metabolic pathways, including the ability to produce methane (methanogenesis) and use alternative energy sources. Some bacteria also have unique metabolic capabilities, but archaea are particularly known for their ability to carry out extreme metabolic processes. It's important to understand that both bacteria and archaea can thrive in a variety of environments, including extreme and non-extreme conditions. The distinction between these two domains is primarily based on their genetic and biochemical characteristics rather than their habitat preferences.
← The genetics of german cockroaches linked genes and gametes Understanding osmosis why did the potato slice become limp →